glibc: update patches 2.18 -> 2.20

Signed-off-by: Michael Olbrich <m.olbrich@pengutronix.de>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 37 deletions

diff --git a/patches/glibc-2.18/0011-malloc-Check-for-integer-overflow-in-valloc.patch b/patches/glibc-2.18/0011-malloc-Check-for-integer-overflow-in-valloc.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 1a29ffb..0000000
--- a/patches/glibc-2.18/0011-malloc-Check-for-integer-overflow-in-valloc.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,37 +0,0 @@
-From: Will Newton <will.newton@linaro.org>
-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:59:37 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH] malloc: Check for integer overflow in valloc.
-
-A large bytes parameter to valloc could cause an integer overflow
-and corrupt allocator internals. Check the overflow does not occur
-before continuing with the allocation.
-
-ChangeLog:
-
-2013-09-11  Will Newton  <will.newton@linaro.org>
-
-	[BZ #15856]
-	* malloc/malloc.c (__libc_valloc): Check the value of bytes
-	does not overflow.
----
- malloc/malloc.c | 7 +++++++
- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
-
-diff --git a/malloc/malloc.c b/malloc/malloc.c
-index bcc08c4..31e2dfa 100644
---- a/malloc/malloc.c
-+++ b/malloc/malloc.c
-@@ -3046,6 +3046,13 @@ __libc_valloc(size_t bytes)
- 
-   size_t pagesz = GLRO(dl_pagesize);
- 
-+  /* Check for overflow.  */
-+  if (bytes > SIZE_MAX - pagesz - MINSIZE)
-+    {
-+      __set_errno (ENOMEM);
-+      return 0;
-+    }
-+
-   void *(*hook) (size_t, size_t, const void *) =
-     force_reg (__memalign_hook);
-   if (__builtin_expect (hook != NULL, 0))