diff options
author | Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> | 2015-10-11 11:43:35 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> | 2015-10-15 08:56:21 +0200 |
commit | 4ef026c30483a724bd577bf739e1da2474bc1001 (patch) | |
tree | 982efdb3cee45b6f9ccb4d23fa76b3bae51ba83e /arch/arm/Makefile | |
parent | 93fc1f1a1a58249c1811bc320975792e900580ea (diff) | |
download | barebox-4ef026c30483a724bd577bf739e1da2474bc1001.tar.gz barebox-4ef026c30483a724bd577bf739e1da2474bc1001.tar.xz |
arm: Disable unaligned accesses
From reading ARM architecture related documentation if appears that
while unaligned memory access is supported by the processor in general
it is not supported if MMU is disabled.
The problem in question can be easily reproduced by building the code
without this patch, MMU disabled, and trying to run 'memtest'
command. Which would in turn call mem_test() which would eventually
call show_progress(). That last function, if build without
-mno-unaligned-access would result in unaligned memory access which
would result in Barebox hanging.
This patch instructs the compiler to not generate any unaligned
accesses to memory thus avoiding the problem.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/Makefile')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/arm/Makefile | 7 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/Makefile b/arch/arm/Makefile index 721aa9bd9d..cae05ff52b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/Makefile +++ b/arch/arm/Makefile @@ -13,6 +13,13 @@ AS += -EL LD += -EL endif +# Unaligned access is not supported when MMU is disabled, so given how +# at least some of the code would be executed with MMU off, lets be +# conservative and instruct the compiler not to generate any unaligned +# accesses +CFLAGS += -mno-unaligned-access + + # This selects which instruction set is used. # Note that GCC does not numerically define an architecture version # macro, but instead defines a whole series of macros which makes |