summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDamien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>2017-12-21 15:43:39 +0900
committerJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>2018-01-05 09:22:17 -0700
commitbf09ce56f0e654b94d980b9aa89e3fce78887e01 (patch)
tree9ef99109ad0b7629d29be6d506013b6fa8072801
parent6cc77e9cb08041627fe1d32ac3a743249deb8167 (diff)
downloadlinux-0-day-bf09ce56f0e654b94d980b9aa89e3fce78887e01.tar.gz
linux-0-day-bf09ce56f0e654b94d980b9aa89e3fce78887e01.tar.xz
mq-deadline: Introduce dispatch helpers
Avoid directly referencing the next_rq and fifo_list arrays using the helper functions deadline_next_request() and deadline_fifo_request() to facilitate changes in the dispatch request selection in __dd_dispatch_request() for zoned block devices. Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-rw-r--r--block/mq-deadline.c45
1 files changed, 37 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/block/mq-deadline.c b/block/mq-deadline.c
index 0179e484ec98c..8bd6db9e69c7b 100644
--- a/block/mq-deadline.c
+++ b/block/mq-deadline.c
@@ -192,13 +192,42 @@ static inline int deadline_check_fifo(struct deadline_data *dd, int ddir)
}
/*
+ * For the specified data direction, return the next request to
+ * dispatch using arrival ordered lists.
+ */
+static struct request *
+deadline_fifo_request(struct deadline_data *dd, int data_dir)
+{
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(data_dir != READ && data_dir != WRITE))
+ return NULL;
+
+ if (list_empty(&dd->fifo_list[data_dir]))
+ return NULL;
+
+ return rq_entry_fifo(dd->fifo_list[data_dir].next);
+}
+
+/*
+ * For the specified data direction, return the next request to
+ * dispatch using sector position sorted lists.
+ */
+static struct request *
+deadline_next_request(struct deadline_data *dd, int data_dir)
+{
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(data_dir != READ && data_dir != WRITE))
+ return NULL;
+
+ return dd->next_rq[data_dir];
+}
+
+/*
* deadline_dispatch_requests selects the best request according to
* read/write expire, fifo_batch, etc
*/
static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
{
struct deadline_data *dd = hctx->queue->elevator->elevator_data;
- struct request *rq;
+ struct request *rq, *next_rq;
bool reads, writes;
int data_dir;
@@ -214,10 +243,9 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
/*
* batches are currently reads XOR writes
*/
- if (dd->next_rq[WRITE])
- rq = dd->next_rq[WRITE];
- else
- rq = dd->next_rq[READ];
+ rq = deadline_next_request(dd, WRITE);
+ if (!rq)
+ rq = deadline_next_request(dd, READ);
if (rq && dd->batching < dd->fifo_batch)
/* we have a next request are still entitled to batch */
@@ -260,19 +288,20 @@ dispatch_find_request:
/*
* we are not running a batch, find best request for selected data_dir
*/
- if (deadline_check_fifo(dd, data_dir) || !dd->next_rq[data_dir]) {
+ next_rq = deadline_next_request(dd, data_dir);
+ if (deadline_check_fifo(dd, data_dir) || !next_rq) {
/*
* A deadline has expired, the last request was in the other
* direction, or we have run out of higher-sectored requests.
* Start again from the request with the earliest expiry time.
*/
- rq = rq_entry_fifo(dd->fifo_list[data_dir].next);
+ rq = deadline_fifo_request(dd, data_dir);
} else {
/*
* The last req was the same dir and we have a next request in
* sort order. No expired requests so continue on from here.
*/
- rq = dd->next_rq[data_dir];
+ rq = next_rq;
}
dd->batching = 0;