KVM: Protect device ops->create and list_add with kvm->lock

KVM devices were manipulating list data structures without any form of
synchronization, and some implementations of the create operations also
suffered from a lack of synchronization.

Now when we've split the xics create operation into create and init, we
can hold the kvm->lock mutex while calling the create operation and when
manipulating the devices list.

The error path in the generic code gets slightly ugly because we have to
take the mutex again and delete the device from the list, but holding
the mutex during anon_inode_getfd or releasing/locking the mutex in the
common non-error path seemed wrong.

Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>

2 files changed, 16 insertions, 14 deletions

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c
index fb4b0a79a9502..83777c1cbae06 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c
@@ -73,12 +73,8 @@ int kvm_vgic_create(struct kvm *kvm, u32 type)
 	int i, vcpu_lock_idx = -1, ret;
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
 
-	mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
-
-	if (irqchip_in_kernel(kvm)) {
-		ret = -EEXIST;
-		goto out;
-	}
+	if (irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))
+		return -EEXIST;
 
 	/*
 	 * This function is also called by the KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP handler,
@@ -87,10 +83,8 @@ int kvm_vgic_create(struct kvm *kvm, u32 type)
 	 * the proper checks already.
 	 */
 	if (type == KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2 &&
-		!kvm_vgic_global_state.can_emulate_gicv2) {
-		ret = -ENODEV;
-		goto out;
-	}
+		!kvm_vgic_global_state.can_emulate_gicv2)
+		return -ENODEV;
 
 	/*
 	 * Any time a vcpu is run, vcpu_load is called which tries to grab the
@@ -138,9 +132,6 @@ out_unlock:
 		vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, vcpu_lock_idx);
 		mutex_unlock(&vcpu->mutex);
 	}
-
-out:
-	mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
 	return ret;
 }
 
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index ae642452e91a5..195078225aa5d 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -696,6 +696,11 @@ static void kvm_destroy_devices(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	struct kvm_device *dev, *tmp;
 
+	/*
+	 * We do not need to take the kvm->lock here, because nobody else
+	 * has a reference to the struct kvm at this point and therefore
+	 * cannot access the devices list anyhow.
+	 */
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp, &kvm->devices, vm_node) {
 		list_del(&dev->vm_node);
 		dev->ops->destroy(dev);
@@ -2832,11 +2837,15 @@ static int kvm_ioctl_create_device(struct kvm *kvm,
 	dev->ops = ops;
 	dev->kvm = kvm;
 
+	mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
 	ret = ops->create(dev, cd->type);
 	if (ret < 0) {
+		mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
 		kfree(dev);
 		return ret;
 	}
+	list_add(&dev->vm_node, &kvm->devices);
+	mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
 
 	if (ops->init)
 		ops->init(dev);
@@ -2844,10 +2853,12 @@ static int kvm_ioctl_create_device(struct kvm *kvm,
 	ret = anon_inode_getfd(ops->name, &kvm_device_fops, dev, O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		ops->destroy(dev);
+		mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
+		list_del(&dev->vm_node);
+		mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	list_add(&dev->vm_node, &kvm->devices);
 	kvm_get_kvm(kvm);
 	cd->fd = ret;
 	return 0;