diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'block/bfq-iosched.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | block/bfq-iosched.c | 57 |
1 files changed, 46 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 2cf395daee80d..7066d90f09df9 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -166,6 +166,20 @@ static const int bfq_async_charge_factor = 10; /* Default timeout values, in jiffies, approximating CFQ defaults. */ const int bfq_timeout = HZ / 8; +/* + * Time limit for merging (see comments in bfq_setup_cooperator). Set + * to the slowest value that, in our tests, proved to be effective in + * removing false positives, while not causing true positives to miss + * queue merging. + * + * As can be deduced from the low time limit below, queue merging, if + * successful, happens at the very beggining of the I/O of the involved + * cooperating processes, as a consequence of the arrival of the very + * first requests from each cooperator. After that, there is very + * little chance to find cooperators. + */ +static const unsigned long bfq_merge_time_limit = HZ/10; + static struct kmem_cache *bfq_pool; /* Below this threshold (in ns), we consider thinktime immediate. */ @@ -444,6 +458,13 @@ bfq_rq_pos_tree_lookup(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct rb_root *root, return bfqq; } +static bool bfq_too_late_for_merging(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) +{ + return bfqq->service_from_backlogged > 0 && + time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq->first_IO_time + + bfq_merge_time_limit); +} + void bfq_pos_tree_add_move(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq) { struct rb_node **p, *parent; @@ -454,6 +475,14 @@ void bfq_pos_tree_add_move(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq) bfqq->pos_root = NULL; } + /* + * bfqq cannot be merged any longer (see comments in + * bfq_setup_cooperator): no point in adding bfqq into the + * position tree. + */ + if (bfq_too_late_for_merging(bfqq)) + return; + if (bfq_class_idle(bfqq)) return; if (!bfqq->next_rq) @@ -1935,6 +1964,9 @@ bfq_setup_merge(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq) static bool bfq_may_be_close_cooperator(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq) { + if (bfq_too_late_for_merging(new_bfqq)) + return false; + if (bfq_class_idle(bfqq) || bfq_class_idle(new_bfqq) || (bfqq->ioprio_class != new_bfqq->ioprio_class)) return false; @@ -2003,6 +2035,20 @@ bfq_setup_cooperator(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, { struct bfq_queue *in_service_bfqq, *new_bfqq; + /* + * Prevent bfqq from being merged if it has been created too + * long ago. The idea is that true cooperating processes, and + * thus their associated bfq_queues, are supposed to be + * created shortly after each other. This is the case, e.g., + * for KVM/QEMU and dump I/O threads. Basing on this + * assumption, the following filtering greatly reduces the + * probability that two non-cooperating processes, which just + * happen to do close I/O for some short time interval, have + * their queues merged by mistake. + */ + if (bfq_too_late_for_merging(bfqq)) + return NULL; + if (bfqq->new_bfqq) return bfqq->new_bfqq; @@ -3003,17 +3049,6 @@ void bfq_bfqq_expire(struct bfq_data *bfqd, slow = bfq_bfqq_is_slow(bfqd, bfqq, compensate, reason, &delta); /* - * Increase service_from_backlogged before next statement, - * because the possible next invocation of - * bfq_bfqq_charge_time would likely inflate - * entity->service. In contrast, service_from_backlogged must - * contain real service, to enable the soft real-time - * heuristic to correctly compute the bandwidth consumed by - * bfqq. - */ - bfqq->service_from_backlogged += entity->service; - - /* * As above explained, charge slow (typically seeky) and * timed-out queues with the time and not the service * received, to favor sequential workloads. |