diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched/deadline.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/deadline.c | 894 |
1 files changed, 851 insertions, 43 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c index a2ce59015642c..a84299f44b5d8 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ #include "sched.h" #include <linux/slab.h> +#include <uapi/linux/sched/types.h> struct dl_bandwidth def_dl_bandwidth; @@ -43,6 +44,254 @@ static inline int on_dl_rq(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se) return !RB_EMPTY_NODE(&dl_se->rb_node); } +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP +static inline struct dl_bw *dl_bw_of(int i) +{ + RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held(), + "sched RCU must be held"); + return &cpu_rq(i)->rd->dl_bw; +} + +static inline int dl_bw_cpus(int i) +{ + struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(i)->rd; + int cpus = 0; + + RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held(), + "sched RCU must be held"); + for_each_cpu_and(i, rd->span, cpu_active_mask) + cpus++; + + return cpus; +} +#else +static inline struct dl_bw *dl_bw_of(int i) +{ + return &cpu_rq(i)->dl.dl_bw; +} + +static inline int dl_bw_cpus(int i) +{ + return 1; +} +#endif + +static inline +void add_running_bw(u64 dl_bw, struct dl_rq *dl_rq) +{ + u64 old = dl_rq->running_bw; + + lockdep_assert_held(&(rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq))->lock); + dl_rq->running_bw += dl_bw; + SCHED_WARN_ON(dl_rq->running_bw < old); /* overflow */ + SCHED_WARN_ON(dl_rq->running_bw > dl_rq->this_bw); +} + +static inline +void sub_running_bw(u64 dl_bw, struct dl_rq *dl_rq) +{ + u64 old = dl_rq->running_bw; + + lockdep_assert_held(&(rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq))->lock); + dl_rq->running_bw -= dl_bw; + SCHED_WARN_ON(dl_rq->running_bw > old); /* underflow */ + if (dl_rq->running_bw > old) + dl_rq->running_bw = 0; +} + +static inline +void add_rq_bw(u64 dl_bw, struct dl_rq *dl_rq) +{ + u64 old = dl_rq->this_bw; + + lockdep_assert_held(&(rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq))->lock); + dl_rq->this_bw += dl_bw; + SCHED_WARN_ON(dl_rq->this_bw < old); /* overflow */ +} + +static inline +void sub_rq_bw(u64 dl_bw, struct dl_rq *dl_rq) +{ + u64 old = dl_rq->this_bw; + + lockdep_assert_held(&(rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq))->lock); + dl_rq->this_bw -= dl_bw; + SCHED_WARN_ON(dl_rq->this_bw > old); /* underflow */ + if (dl_rq->this_bw > old) + dl_rq->this_bw = 0; + SCHED_WARN_ON(dl_rq->running_bw > dl_rq->this_bw); +} + +void dl_change_utilization(struct task_struct *p, u64 new_bw) +{ + struct rq *rq; + + if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) + return; + + rq = task_rq(p); + if (p->dl.dl_non_contending) { + sub_running_bw(p->dl.dl_bw, &rq->dl); + p->dl.dl_non_contending = 0; + /* + * If the timer handler is currently running and the + * timer cannot be cancelled, inactive_task_timer() + * will see that dl_not_contending is not set, and + * will not touch the rq's active utilization, + * so we are still safe. + */ + if (hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&p->dl.inactive_timer) == 1) + put_task_struct(p); + } + sub_rq_bw(p->dl.dl_bw, &rq->dl); + add_rq_bw(new_bw, &rq->dl); +} + +/* + * The utilization of a task cannot be immediately removed from + * the rq active utilization (running_bw) when the task blocks. + * Instead, we have to wait for the so called "0-lag time". + * + * If a task blocks before the "0-lag time", a timer (the inactive + * timer) is armed, and running_bw is decreased when the timer + * fires. + * + * If the task wakes up again before the inactive timer fires, + * the timer is cancelled, whereas if the task wakes up after the + * inactive timer fired (and running_bw has been decreased) the + * task's utilization has to be added to running_bw again. + * A flag in the deadline scheduling entity (dl_non_contending) + * is used to avoid race conditions between the inactive timer handler + * and task wakeups. + * + * The following diagram shows how running_bw is updated. A task is + * "ACTIVE" when its utilization contributes to running_bw; an + * "ACTIVE contending" task is in the TASK_RUNNING state, while an + * "ACTIVE non contending" task is a blocked task for which the "0-lag time" + * has not passed yet. An "INACTIVE" task is a task for which the "0-lag" + * time already passed, which does not contribute to running_bw anymore. + * +------------------+ + * wakeup | ACTIVE | + * +------------------>+ contending | + * | add_running_bw | | + * | +----+------+------+ + * | | ^ + * | dequeue | | + * +--------+-------+ | | + * | | t >= 0-lag | | wakeup + * | INACTIVE |<---------------+ | + * | | sub_running_bw | | + * +--------+-------+ | | + * ^ | | + * | t < 0-lag | | + * | | | + * | V | + * | +----+------+------+ + * | sub_running_bw | ACTIVE | + * +-------------------+ | + * inactive timer | non contending | + * fired +------------------+ + * + * The task_non_contending() function is invoked when a task + * blocks, and checks if the 0-lag time already passed or + * not (in the first case, it directly updates running_bw; + * in the second case, it arms the inactive timer). + * + * The task_contending() function is invoked when a task wakes + * up, and checks if the task is still in the "ACTIVE non contending" + * state or not (in the second case, it updates running_bw). + */ +static void task_non_contending(struct task_struct *p) +{ + struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl; + struct hrtimer *timer = &dl_se->inactive_timer; + struct dl_rq *dl_rq = dl_rq_of_se(dl_se); + struct rq *rq = rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq); + s64 zerolag_time; + + /* + * If this is a non-deadline task that has been boosted, + * do nothing + */ + if (dl_se->dl_runtime == 0) + return; + + WARN_ON(hrtimer_active(&dl_se->inactive_timer)); + WARN_ON(dl_se->dl_non_contending); + + zerolag_time = dl_se->deadline - + div64_long((dl_se->runtime * dl_se->dl_period), + dl_se->dl_runtime); + + /* + * Using relative times instead of the absolute "0-lag time" + * allows to simplify the code + */ + zerolag_time -= rq_clock(rq); + + /* + * If the "0-lag time" already passed, decrease the active + * utilization now, instead of starting a timer + */ + if (zerolag_time < 0) { + if (dl_task(p)) + sub_running_bw(dl_se->dl_bw, dl_rq); + if (!dl_task(p) || p->state == TASK_DEAD) { + struct dl_bw *dl_b = dl_bw_of(task_cpu(p)); + + if (p->state == TASK_DEAD) + sub_rq_bw(p->dl.dl_bw, &rq->dl); + raw_spin_lock(&dl_b->lock); + __dl_clear(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, dl_bw_cpus(task_cpu(p))); + __dl_clear_params(p); + raw_spin_unlock(&dl_b->lock); + } + + return; + } + + dl_se->dl_non_contending = 1; + get_task_struct(p); + hrtimer_start(timer, ns_to_ktime(zerolag_time), HRTIMER_MODE_REL); +} + +static void task_contending(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, int flags) +{ + struct dl_rq *dl_rq = dl_rq_of_se(dl_se); + + /* + * If this is a non-deadline task that has been boosted, + * do nothing + */ + if (dl_se->dl_runtime == 0) + return; + + if (flags & ENQUEUE_MIGRATED) + add_rq_bw(dl_se->dl_bw, dl_rq); + + if (dl_se->dl_non_contending) { + dl_se->dl_non_contending = 0; + /* + * If the timer handler is currently running and the + * timer cannot be cancelled, inactive_task_timer() + * will see that dl_not_contending is not set, and + * will not touch the rq's active utilization, + * so we are still safe. + */ + if (hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&dl_se->inactive_timer) == 1) + put_task_struct(dl_task_of(dl_se)); + } else { + /* + * Since "dl_non_contending" is not set, the + * task's utilization has already been removed from + * active utilization (either when the task blocked, + * when the "inactive timer" fired). + * So, add it back. + */ + add_running_bw(dl_se->dl_bw, dl_rq); + } +} + static inline int is_leftmost(struct task_struct *p, struct dl_rq *dl_rq) { struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl; @@ -83,6 +332,10 @@ void init_dl_rq(struct dl_rq *dl_rq) #else init_dl_bw(&dl_rq->dl_bw); #endif + + dl_rq->running_bw = 0; + dl_rq->this_bw = 0; + init_dl_rq_bw_ratio(dl_rq); } #ifdef CONFIG_SMP @@ -484,13 +737,84 @@ static bool dl_entity_overflow(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, } /* - * When a -deadline entity is queued back on the runqueue, its runtime and - * deadline might need updating. + * Revised wakeup rule [1]: For self-suspending tasks, rather then + * re-initializing task's runtime and deadline, the revised wakeup + * rule adjusts the task's runtime to avoid the task to overrun its + * density. + * + * Reasoning: a task may overrun the density if: + * runtime / (deadline - t) > dl_runtime / dl_deadline + * + * Therefore, runtime can be adjusted to: + * runtime = (dl_runtime / dl_deadline) * (deadline - t) + * + * In such way that runtime will be equal to the maximum density + * the task can use without breaking any rule. + * + * [1] Luca Abeni, Giuseppe Lipari, and Juri Lelli. 2015. Constant + * bandwidth server revisited. SIGBED Rev. 11, 4 (January 2015), 19-24. + */ +static void +update_dl_revised_wakeup(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct rq *rq) +{ + u64 laxity = dl_se->deadline - rq_clock(rq); + + /* + * If the task has deadline < period, and the deadline is in the past, + * it should already be throttled before this check. + * + * See update_dl_entity() comments for further details. + */ + WARN_ON(dl_time_before(dl_se->deadline, rq_clock(rq))); + + dl_se->runtime = (dl_se->dl_density * laxity) >> BW_SHIFT; +} + +/* + * Regarding the deadline, a task with implicit deadline has a relative + * deadline == relative period. A task with constrained deadline has a + * relative deadline <= relative period. + * + * We support constrained deadline tasks. However, there are some restrictions + * applied only for tasks which do not have an implicit deadline. See + * update_dl_entity() to know more about such restrictions. + * + * The dl_is_implicit() returns true if the task has an implicit deadline. + */ +static inline bool dl_is_implicit(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se) +{ + return dl_se->dl_deadline == dl_se->dl_period; +} + +/* + * When a deadline entity is placed in the runqueue, its runtime and deadline + * might need to be updated. This is done by a CBS wake up rule. There are two + * different rules: 1) the original CBS; and 2) the Revisited CBS. + * + * When the task is starting a new period, the Original CBS is used. In this + * case, the runtime is replenished and a new absolute deadline is set. + * + * When a task is queued before the begin of the next period, using the + * remaining runtime and deadline could make the entity to overflow, see + * dl_entity_overflow() to find more about runtime overflow. When such case + * is detected, the runtime and deadline need to be updated. + * + * If the task has an implicit deadline, i.e., deadline == period, the Original + * CBS is applied. the runtime is replenished and a new absolute deadline is + * set, as in the previous cases. + * + * However, the Original CBS does not work properly for tasks with + * deadline < period, which are said to have a constrained deadline. By + * applying the Original CBS, a constrained deadline task would be able to run + * runtime/deadline in a period. With deadline < period, the task would + * overrun the runtime/period allowed bandwidth, breaking the admission test. * - * The policy here is that we update the deadline of the entity only if: - * - the current deadline is in the past, - * - using the remaining runtime with the current deadline would make - * the entity exceed its bandwidth. + * In order to prevent this misbehave, the Revisited CBS is used for + * constrained deadline tasks when a runtime overflow is detected. In the + * Revisited CBS, rather than replenishing & setting a new absolute deadline, + * the remaining runtime of the task is reduced to avoid runtime overflow. + * Please refer to the comments update_dl_revised_wakeup() function to find + * more about the Revised CBS rule. */ static void update_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct sched_dl_entity *pi_se) @@ -500,6 +824,14 @@ static void update_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, if (dl_time_before(dl_se->deadline, rq_clock(rq)) || dl_entity_overflow(dl_se, pi_se, rq_clock(rq))) { + + if (unlikely(!dl_is_implicit(dl_se) && + !dl_time_before(dl_se->deadline, rq_clock(rq)) && + !dl_se->dl_boosted)){ + update_dl_revised_wakeup(dl_se, rq); + return; + } + dl_se->deadline = rq_clock(rq) + pi_se->dl_deadline; dl_se->runtime = pi_se->dl_runtime; } @@ -593,10 +925,8 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart dl_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer) * The task might have changed its scheduling policy to something * different than SCHED_DEADLINE (through switched_from_dl()). */ - if (!dl_task(p)) { - __dl_clear_params(p); + if (!dl_task(p)) goto unlock; - } /* * The task might have been boosted by someone else and might be in the @@ -723,6 +1053,8 @@ static inline void dl_check_constrained_dl(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se) if (unlikely(dl_se->dl_boosted || !start_dl_timer(p))) return; dl_se->dl_throttled = 1; + if (dl_se->runtime > 0) + dl_se->runtime = 0; } } @@ -735,6 +1067,47 @@ int dl_runtime_exceeded(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se) extern bool sched_rt_bandwidth_account(struct rt_rq *rt_rq); /* + * This function implements the GRUB accounting rule: + * according to the GRUB reclaiming algorithm, the runtime is + * not decreased as "dq = -dt", but as + * "dq = -max{u / Umax, (1 - Uinact - Uextra)} dt", + * where u is the utilization of the task, Umax is the maximum reclaimable + * utilization, Uinact is the (per-runqueue) inactive utilization, computed + * as the difference between the "total runqueue utilization" and the + * runqueue active utilization, and Uextra is the (per runqueue) extra + * reclaimable utilization. + * Since rq->dl.running_bw and rq->dl.this_bw contain utilizations + * multiplied by 2^BW_SHIFT, the result has to be shifted right by + * BW_SHIFT. + * Since rq->dl.bw_ratio contains 1 / Umax multipled by 2^RATIO_SHIFT, + * dl_bw is multiped by rq->dl.bw_ratio and shifted right by RATIO_SHIFT. + * Since delta is a 64 bit variable, to have an overflow its value + * should be larger than 2^(64 - 20 - 8), which is more than 64 seconds. + * So, overflow is not an issue here. + */ +u64 grub_reclaim(u64 delta, struct rq *rq, struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se) +{ + u64 u_inact = rq->dl.this_bw - rq->dl.running_bw; /* Utot - Uact */ + u64 u_act; + u64 u_act_min = (dl_se->dl_bw * rq->dl.bw_ratio) >> RATIO_SHIFT; + + /* + * Instead of computing max{u * bw_ratio, (1 - u_inact - u_extra)}, + * we compare u_inact + rq->dl.extra_bw with + * 1 - (u * rq->dl.bw_ratio >> RATIO_SHIFT), because + * u_inact + rq->dl.extra_bw can be larger than + * 1 * (so, 1 - u_inact - rq->dl.extra_bw would be negative + * leading to wrong results) + */ + if (u_inact + rq->dl.extra_bw > BW_UNIT - u_act_min) + u_act = u_act_min; + else + u_act = BW_UNIT - u_inact - rq->dl.extra_bw; + + return (delta * u_act) >> BW_SHIFT; +} + +/* * Update the current task's runtime statistics (provided it is still * a -deadline task and has not been removed from the dl_rq). */ @@ -776,6 +1149,8 @@ static void update_curr_dl(struct rq *rq) sched_rt_avg_update(rq, delta_exec); + if (unlikely(dl_se->flags & SCHED_FLAG_RECLAIM)) + delta_exec = grub_reclaim(delta_exec, rq, &curr->dl); dl_se->runtime -= delta_exec; throttle: @@ -815,6 +1190,56 @@ throttle: } } +static enum hrtimer_restart inactive_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer) +{ + struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = container_of(timer, + struct sched_dl_entity, + inactive_timer); + struct task_struct *p = dl_task_of(dl_se); + struct rq_flags rf; + struct rq *rq; + + rq = task_rq_lock(p, &rf); + + if (!dl_task(p) || p->state == TASK_DEAD) { + struct dl_bw *dl_b = dl_bw_of(task_cpu(p)); + + if (p->state == TASK_DEAD && dl_se->dl_non_contending) { + sub_running_bw(p->dl.dl_bw, dl_rq_of_se(&p->dl)); + sub_rq_bw(p->dl.dl_bw, dl_rq_of_se(&p->dl)); + dl_se->dl_non_contending = 0; + } + + raw_spin_lock(&dl_b->lock); + __dl_clear(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, dl_bw_cpus(task_cpu(p))); + raw_spin_unlock(&dl_b->lock); + __dl_clear_params(p); + + goto unlock; + } + if (dl_se->dl_non_contending == 0) + goto unlock; + + sched_clock_tick(); + update_rq_clock(rq); + + sub_running_bw(dl_se->dl_bw, &rq->dl); + dl_se->dl_non_contending = 0; +unlock: + task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf); + put_task_struct(p); + + return HRTIMER_NORESTART; +} + +void init_dl_inactive_task_timer(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se) +{ + struct hrtimer *timer = &dl_se->inactive_timer; + + hrtimer_init(timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL); + timer->function = inactive_task_timer; +} + #ifdef CONFIG_SMP static void inc_dl_deadline(struct dl_rq *dl_rq, u64 deadline) @@ -946,10 +1371,12 @@ enqueue_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, * parameters of the task might need updating. Otherwise, * we want a replenishment of its runtime. */ - if (flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP) + if (flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP) { + task_contending(dl_se, flags); update_dl_entity(dl_se, pi_se); - else if (flags & ENQUEUE_REPLENISH) + } else if (flags & ENQUEUE_REPLENISH) { replenish_dl_entity(dl_se, pi_se); + } __enqueue_dl_entity(dl_se); } @@ -959,11 +1386,6 @@ static void dequeue_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se) __dequeue_dl_entity(dl_se); } -static inline bool dl_is_constrained(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se) -{ - return dl_se->dl_deadline < dl_se->dl_period; -} - static void enqueue_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags) { struct task_struct *pi_task = rt_mutex_get_top_task(p); @@ -995,17 +1417,32 @@ static void enqueue_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags) * If that is the case, the task will be throttled and * the replenishment timer will be set to the next period. */ - if (!p->dl.dl_throttled && dl_is_constrained(&p->dl)) + if (!p->dl.dl_throttled && !dl_is_implicit(&p->dl)) dl_check_constrained_dl(&p->dl); + if (p->on_rq == TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING || flags & ENQUEUE_RESTORE) { + add_rq_bw(p->dl.dl_bw, &rq->dl); + add_running_bw(p->dl.dl_bw, &rq->dl); + } + /* - * If p is throttled, we do nothing. In fact, if it exhausted + * If p is throttled, we do not enqueue it. In fact, if it exhausted * its budget it needs a replenishment and, since it now is on * its rq, the bandwidth timer callback (which clearly has not * run yet) will take care of this. + * However, the active utilization does not depend on the fact + * that the task is on the runqueue or not (but depends on the + * task's state - in GRUB parlance, "inactive" vs "active contending"). + * In other words, even if a task is throttled its utilization must + * be counted in the active utilization; hence, we need to call + * add_running_bw(). */ - if (p->dl.dl_throttled && !(flags & ENQUEUE_REPLENISH)) + if (p->dl.dl_throttled && !(flags & ENQUEUE_REPLENISH)) { + if (flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP) + task_contending(&p->dl, flags); + return; + } enqueue_dl_entity(&p->dl, pi_se, flags); @@ -1023,6 +1460,23 @@ static void dequeue_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags) { update_curr_dl(rq); __dequeue_task_dl(rq, p, flags); + + if (p->on_rq == TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING || flags & DEQUEUE_SAVE) { + sub_running_bw(p->dl.dl_bw, &rq->dl); + sub_rq_bw(p->dl.dl_bw, &rq->dl); + } + + /* + * This check allows to start the inactive timer (or to immediately + * decrease the active utilization, if needed) in two cases: + * when the task blocks and when it is terminating + * (p->state == TASK_DEAD). We can handle the two cases in the same + * way, because from GRUB's point of view the same thing is happening + * (the task moves from "active contending" to "active non contending" + * or "inactive") + */ + if (flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP) + task_non_contending(p); } /* @@ -1100,6 +1554,37 @@ out: return cpu; } +static void migrate_task_rq_dl(struct task_struct *p) +{ + struct rq *rq; + + if (p->state != TASK_WAKING) + return; + + rq = task_rq(p); + /* + * Since p->state == TASK_WAKING, set_task_cpu() has been called + * from try_to_wake_up(). Hence, p->pi_lock is locked, but + * rq->lock is not... So, lock it + */ + raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); + if (p->dl.dl_non_contending) { + sub_running_bw(p->dl.dl_bw, &rq->dl); + p->dl.dl_non_contending = 0; + /* + * If the timer handler is currently running and the + * timer cannot be cancelled, inactive_task_timer() + * will see that dl_not_contending is not set, and + * will not touch the rq's active utilization, + * so we are still safe. + */ + if (hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&p->dl.inactive_timer) == 1) + put_task_struct(p); + } + sub_rq_bw(p->dl.dl_bw, &rq->dl); + raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); +} + static void check_preempt_equal_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) { /* @@ -1255,19 +1740,6 @@ static void task_fork_dl(struct task_struct *p) */ } -static void task_dead_dl(struct task_struct *p) -{ - struct dl_bw *dl_b = dl_bw_of(task_cpu(p)); - - /* - * Since we are TASK_DEAD we won't slip out of the domain! - */ - raw_spin_lock_irq(&dl_b->lock); - /* XXX we should retain the bw until 0-lag */ - dl_b->total_bw -= p->dl.dl_bw; - raw_spin_unlock_irq(&dl_b->lock); -} - static void set_curr_task_dl(struct rq *rq) { struct task_struct *p = rq->curr; @@ -1533,7 +2005,7 @@ retry: * then possible that next_task has migrated. */ task = pick_next_pushable_dl_task(rq); - if (task_cpu(next_task) == rq->cpu && task == next_task) { + if (task == next_task) { /* * The task is still there. We don't try * again, some other cpu will pull it when ready. @@ -1551,7 +2023,11 @@ retry: } deactivate_task(rq, next_task, 0); + sub_running_bw(next_task->dl.dl_bw, &rq->dl); + sub_rq_bw(next_task->dl.dl_bw, &rq->dl); set_task_cpu(next_task, later_rq->cpu); + add_rq_bw(next_task->dl.dl_bw, &later_rq->dl); + add_running_bw(next_task->dl.dl_bw, &later_rq->dl); activate_task(later_rq, next_task, 0); ret = 1; @@ -1639,7 +2115,11 @@ static void pull_dl_task(struct rq *this_rq) resched = true; deactivate_task(src_rq, p, 0); + sub_running_bw(p->dl.dl_bw, &src_rq->dl); + sub_rq_bw(p->dl.dl_bw, &src_rq->dl); set_task_cpu(p, this_cpu); + add_rq_bw(p->dl.dl_bw, &this_rq->dl); + add_running_bw(p->dl.dl_bw, &this_rq->dl); activate_task(this_rq, p, 0); dmin = p->dl.deadline; @@ -1695,7 +2175,7 @@ static void set_cpus_allowed_dl(struct task_struct *p, * until we complete the update. */ raw_spin_lock(&src_dl_b->lock); - __dl_clear(src_dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw); + __dl_clear(src_dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, dl_bw_cpus(task_cpu(p))); raw_spin_unlock(&src_dl_b->lock); } @@ -1737,13 +2217,26 @@ void __init init_sched_dl_class(void) static void switched_from_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) { /* - * Start the deadline timer; if we switch back to dl before this we'll - * continue consuming our current CBS slice. If we stay outside of - * SCHED_DEADLINE until the deadline passes, the timer will reset the - * task. + * task_non_contending() can start the "inactive timer" (if the 0-lag + * time is in the future). If the task switches back to dl before + * the "inactive timer" fires, it can continue to consume its current + * runtime using its current deadline. If it stays outside of + * SCHED_DEADLINE until the 0-lag time passes, inactive_task_timer() + * will reset the task parameters. */ - if (!start_dl_timer(p)) - __dl_clear_params(p); + if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && p->dl.dl_runtime) + task_non_contending(p); + + if (!task_on_rq_queued(p)) + sub_rq_bw(p->dl.dl_bw, &rq->dl); + + /* + * We cannot use inactive_task_timer() to invoke sub_running_bw() + * at the 0-lag time, because the task could have been migrated + * while SCHED_OTHER in the meanwhile. + */ + if (p->dl.dl_non_contending) + p->dl.dl_non_contending = 0; /* * Since this might be the only -deadline task on the rq, @@ -1762,11 +2255,15 @@ static void switched_from_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) */ static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) { + if (hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&p->dl.inactive_timer) == 1) + put_task_struct(p); /* If p is not queued we will update its parameters at next wakeup. */ - if (!task_on_rq_queued(p)) - return; + if (!task_on_rq_queued(p)) { + add_rq_bw(p->dl.dl_bw, &rq->dl); + return; + } /* * If p is boosted we already updated its params in * rt_mutex_setprio()->enqueue_task(..., ENQUEUE_REPLENISH), @@ -1836,6 +2333,7 @@ const struct sched_class dl_sched_class = { #ifdef CONFIG_SMP .select_task_rq = select_task_rq_dl, + .migrate_task_rq = migrate_task_rq_dl, .set_cpus_allowed = set_cpus_allowed_dl, .rq_online = rq_online_dl, .rq_offline = rq_offline_dl, @@ -1845,7 +2343,6 @@ const struct sched_class dl_sched_class = { .set_curr_task = set_curr_task_dl, .task_tick = task_tick_dl, .task_fork = task_fork_dl, - .task_dead = task_dead_dl, .prio_changed = prio_changed_dl, .switched_from = switched_from_dl, @@ -1854,6 +2351,317 @@ const struct sched_class dl_sched_class = { .update_curr = update_curr_dl, }; +int sched_dl_global_validate(void) +{ + u64 runtime = global_rt_runtime(); + u64 period = global_rt_period(); + u64 new_bw = to_ratio(period, runtime); + struct dl_bw *dl_b; + int cpu, ret = 0; + unsigned long flags; + + /* + * Here we want to check the bandwidth not being set to some + * value smaller than the currently allocated bandwidth in + * any of the root_domains. + * + * FIXME: Cycling on all the CPUs is overdoing, but simpler than + * cycling on root_domains... Discussion on different/better + * solutions is welcome! + */ + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { + rcu_read_lock_sched(); + dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu); + + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags); + if (new_bw < dl_b->total_bw) + ret = -EBUSY; + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags); + + rcu_read_unlock_sched(); + + if (ret) + break; + } + + return ret; +} + +void init_dl_rq_bw_ratio(struct dl_rq *dl_rq) +{ + if (global_rt_runtime() == RUNTIME_INF) { + dl_rq->bw_ratio = 1 << RATIO_SHIFT; + dl_rq->extra_bw = 1 << BW_SHIFT; + } else { + dl_rq->bw_ratio = to_ratio(global_rt_runtime(), + global_rt_period()) >> (BW_SHIFT - RATIO_SHIFT); + dl_rq->extra_bw = to_ratio(global_rt_period(), + global_rt_runtime()); + } +} + +void sched_dl_do_global(void) +{ + u64 new_bw = -1; + struct dl_bw *dl_b; + int cpu; + unsigned long flags; + + def_dl_bandwidth.dl_period = global_rt_period(); + def_dl_bandwidth.dl_runtime = global_rt_runtime(); + + if (global_rt_runtime() != RUNTIME_INF) + new_bw = to_ratio(global_rt_period(), global_rt_runtime()); + + /* + * FIXME: As above... + */ + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { + rcu_read_lock_sched(); + dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu); + + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags); + dl_b->bw = new_bw; + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags); + + rcu_read_unlock_sched(); + init_dl_rq_bw_ratio(&cpu_rq(cpu)->dl); + } +} + +/* + * We must be sure that accepting a new task (or allowing changing the + * parameters of an existing one) is consistent with the bandwidth + * constraints. If yes, this function also accordingly updates the currently + * allocated bandwidth to reflect the new situation. + * + * This function is called while holding p's rq->lock. + */ +int sched_dl_overflow(struct task_struct *p, int policy, + const struct sched_attr *attr) +{ + struct dl_bw *dl_b = dl_bw_of(task_cpu(p)); + u64 period = attr->sched_period ?: attr->sched_deadline; + u64 runtime = attr->sched_runtime; + u64 new_bw = dl_policy(policy) ? to_ratio(period, runtime) : 0; + int cpus, err = -1; + + /* !deadline task may carry old deadline bandwidth */ + if (new_bw == p->dl.dl_bw && task_has_dl_policy(p)) + return 0; + + /* + * Either if a task, enters, leave, or stays -deadline but changes + * its parameters, we may need to update accordingly the total + * allocated bandwidth of the container. + */ + raw_spin_lock(&dl_b->lock); + cpus = dl_bw_cpus(task_cpu(p)); + if (dl_policy(policy) && !task_has_dl_policy(p) && + !__dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, 0, new_bw)) { + if (hrtimer_active(&p->dl.inactive_timer)) + __dl_clear(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, cpus); + __dl_add(dl_b, new_bw, cpus); + err = 0; + } else if (dl_policy(policy) && task_has_dl_policy(p) && + !__dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, p->dl.dl_bw, new_bw)) { + /* + * XXX this is slightly incorrect: when the task + * utilization decreases, we should delay the total + * utilization change until the task's 0-lag point. + * But this would require to set the task's "inactive + * timer" when the task is not inactive. + */ + __dl_clear(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, cpus); + __dl_add(dl_b, new_bw, cpus); + dl_change_utilization(p, new_bw); + err = 0; + } else if (!dl_policy(policy) && task_has_dl_policy(p)) { + /* + * Do not decrease the total deadline utilization here, + * switched_from_dl() will take care to do it at the correct + * (0-lag) time. + */ + err = 0; + } + raw_spin_unlock(&dl_b->lock); + + return err; +} + +/* + * This function initializes the sched_dl_entity of a newly becoming + * SCHED_DEADLINE task. + * + * Only the static values are considered here, the actual runtime and the + * absolute deadline will be properly calculated when the task is enqueued + * for the first time with its new policy. + */ +void __setparam_dl(struct task_struct *p, const struct sched_attr *attr) +{ + struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl; + + dl_se->dl_runtime = attr->sched_runtime; + dl_se->dl_deadline = attr->sched_deadline; + dl_se->dl_period = attr->sched_period ?: dl_se->dl_deadline; + dl_se->flags = attr->sched_flags; + dl_se->dl_bw = to_ratio(dl_se->dl_period, dl_se->dl_runtime); + dl_se->dl_density = to_ratio(dl_se->dl_deadline, dl_se->dl_runtime); +} + +void __getparam_dl(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_attr *attr) +{ + struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl; + + attr->sched_priority = p->rt_priority; + attr->sched_runtime = dl_se->dl_runtime; + attr->sched_deadline = dl_se->dl_deadline; + attr->sched_period = dl_se->dl_period; + attr->sched_flags = dl_se->flags; +} + +/* + * This function validates the new parameters of a -deadline task. + * We ask for the deadline not being zero, and greater or equal + * than the runtime, as well as the period of being zero or + * greater than deadline. Furthermore, we have to be sure that + * user parameters are above the internal resolution of 1us (we + * check sched_runtime only since it is always the smaller one) and + * below 2^63 ns (we have to check both sched_deadline and + * sched_period, as the latter can be zero). + */ +bool __checkparam_dl(const struct sched_attr *attr) +{ + /* deadline != 0 */ + if (attr->sched_deadline == 0) + return false; + + /* + * Since we truncate DL_SCALE bits, make sure we're at least + * that big. + */ + if (attr->sched_runtime < (1ULL << DL_SCALE)) + return false; + + /* + * Since we use the MSB for wrap-around and sign issues, make + * sure it's not set (mind that period can be equal to zero). + */ + if (attr->sched_deadline & (1ULL << 63) || + attr->sched_period & (1ULL << 63)) + return false; + + /* runtime <= deadline <= period (if period != 0) */ + if ((attr->sched_period != 0 && + attr->sched_period < attr->sched_deadline) || + attr->sched_deadline < attr->sched_runtime) + return false; + + return true; +} + +/* + * This function clears the sched_dl_entity static params. + */ +void __dl_clear_params(struct task_struct *p) +{ + struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl; + + dl_se->dl_runtime = 0; + dl_se->dl_deadline = 0; + dl_se->dl_period = 0; + dl_se->flags = 0; + dl_se->dl_bw = 0; + dl_se->dl_density = 0; + + dl_se->dl_throttled = 0; + dl_se->dl_yielded = 0; + dl_se->dl_non_contending = 0; +} + +bool dl_param_changed(struct task_struct *p, const struct sched_attr *attr) +{ + struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl; + + if (dl_se->dl_runtime != attr->sched_runtime || + dl_se->dl_deadline != attr->sched_deadline || + dl_se->dl_period != attr->sched_period || + dl_se->flags != attr->sched_flags) + return true; + + return false; +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP +int dl_task_can_attach(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *cs_cpus_allowed) +{ + unsigned int dest_cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpu_active_mask, + cs_cpus_allowed); + struct dl_bw *dl_b; + bool overflow; + int cpus, ret; + unsigned long flags; + + rcu_read_lock_sched(); + dl_b = dl_bw_of(dest_cpu); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags); + cpus = dl_bw_cpus(dest_cpu); + overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, 0, p->dl.dl_bw); + if (overflow) + ret = -EBUSY; + else { + /* + * We reserve space for this task in the destination + * root_domain, as we can't fail after this point. + * We will free resources in the source root_domain + * later on (see set_cpus_allowed_dl()). + */ + __dl_add(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, cpus); + ret = 0; + } + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags); + rcu_read_unlock_sched(); + return ret; +} + +int dl_cpuset_cpumask_can_shrink(const struct cpumask *cur, + const struct cpumask *trial) +{ + int ret = 1, trial_cpus; + struct dl_bw *cur_dl_b; + unsigned long flags; + + rcu_read_lock_sched(); + cur_dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpumask_any(cur)); + trial_cpus = cpumask_weight(trial); + + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cur_dl_b->lock, flags); + if (cur_dl_b->bw != -1 && + cur_dl_b->bw * trial_cpus < cur_dl_b->total_bw) + ret = 0; + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cur_dl_b->lock, flags); + rcu_read_unlock_sched(); + return ret; +} + +bool dl_cpu_busy(unsigned int cpu) +{ + unsigned long flags; + struct dl_bw *dl_b; + bool overflow; + int cpus; + + rcu_read_lock_sched(); + dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags); + cpus = dl_bw_cpus(cpu); + overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, 0, 0); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags); + rcu_read_unlock_sched(); + return overflow; +} +#endif + #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG extern void print_dl_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct dl_rq *dl_rq); |