summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* hw_breakpoint: Introduce "struct bp_cpuinfo"Oleg Nesterov2013-06-201-33/+36
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch simply moves all per-cpu variables into the new single per-cpu "struct bp_cpuinfo". To me this looks more logical and clean, but this can also simplify the further potential changes. In particular, I do not think this memory should be per-cpu, it is never used "locally". After this change it is trivial to turn it into, say, bootmem[nr_cpu_ids]. Reported-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130620155020.GA6350@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* hw_breakpoint: Simplify *register_wide_hw_breakpoint()Oleg Nesterov2013-06-201-23/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1. register_wide_hw_breakpoint() can use unregister_ if failure, no need to duplicate the code. 2. "struct perf_event **pevent" adds the unnecesary lever of indirection and complication, use per_cpu(*cpu_events, cpu). Reported-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130620155018.GA6347@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* hw_breakpoint: Introduce cpumask_of_bp()Oleg Nesterov2013-06-201-26/+17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add the trivial helper which simply returns cpumask_of() or cpu_possible_mask depending on bp->cpu. Change fetch_bp_busy_slots() and toggle_bp_slot() to always do for_each_cpu(cpumask_of_bp) to simplify the code and avoid the code duplication. Reported-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130620155015.GA6340@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* hw_breakpoint: Simplify the "weight" usage in toggle_bp_slot() pathsOleg Nesterov2013-06-201-12/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Change toggle_bp_slot() to make "weight" negative if !enable. This way we can always use "+ weight" without additional "if (enable)" check and toggle_bp_task_slot() no longer needs this arg. Reported-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130620155013.GA6337@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* hw_breakpoint: Simplify list/idx mess in toggle_bp_slot() pathsOleg Nesterov2013-06-201-24/+16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The enable/disable logic in toggle_bp_slot() is not symmetrical and imho very confusing. "old_count" in toggle_bp_task_slot() is actually new_count because this bp was already removed from the list. Change toggle_bp_slot() to always call list_add/list_del after toggle_bp_task_slot(). This way old_idx is task_bp_pinned() and this entry should be decremented, new_idx is +/-weight and we need to increment this element. The code/logic looks obvious. Reported-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130620155011.GA6330@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* Merge branch 'perf/urgent' into perf/coreIngo Molnar2013-06-201-3/+3
|\ | | | | | | | | | | Merge in two hw_breakpoint fixes, before applying another 5. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
| * hw_breakpoint: Use cpu_possible_mask in {reserve,release}_bp_slot()Oleg Nesterov2013-06-201-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | fetch_bp_busy_slots() and toggle_bp_slot() use for_each_online_cpu(), this is obviously wrong wrt cpu_up() or cpu_down(), we can over/under account the per-cpu numbers. For example: # echo 0 >> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online # perf record -e mem:0x10 -p 1 & # echo 1 >> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online # perf record -e mem:0x10,mem:0x10,mem:0x10,mem:0x10 -C1 -a & # taskset -p 0x2 1 triggers the same WARN_ONCE("Can't find any breakpoint slot") in arch_install_hw_breakpoint(). Reported-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130620155009.GA6327@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
| * hw_breakpoint: Fix cpu check in task_bp_pinned(cpu)Oleg Nesterov2013-06-201-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | trinity fuzzer triggered WARN_ONCE("Can't find any breakpoint slot") in arch_install_hw_breakpoint() but the problem is not arch-specific. The problem is, task_bp_pinned(cpu) checks "cpu == iter->cpu" but this doesn't account the "all cpus" events with iter->cpu < 0. This means that, say, register_user_hw_breakpoint(tsk) can happily create the arbitrary number > HBP_NUM of breakpoints which can not be activated. toggle_bp_task_slot() is equally wrong by the same reason and nr_task_bp_pinned[] can have negative entries. Simple test: # perl -e 'sleep 1 while 1' & # perf record -e mem:0x10,mem:0x10,mem:0x10,mem:0x10,mem:0x10 -p `pidof perl` Before this patch this triggers the same problem/WARN_ON(), after the patch it correctly fails with -ENOSPC. Reported-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130620155006.GA6324@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* | perf: Fix hw breakpoints overflow period samplingJiri Olsa2013-05-281-0/+5
|/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The hw breakpoint pmu 'add' function is missing the period_left update needed for SW events. The perf HW breakpoint events use the SW events framework to process the overflow, so it needs to be properly initialized in the PMU 'add' method. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1367421944-19082-5-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* perf/hwbp: Fix cleanup in case of kzalloc failureDaniel Baluta2013-02-141-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Obviously this is a typo and could result in memory leaks if kzalloc fails on a given cpu. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <dbaluta@ixiacom.com> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1360186160-7566-1-git-send-email-dbaluta@ixiacom.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
* perf, powerpc: Fix hw breakpoints returning -ENOSPCMichael Neuling2012-10-301-5/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I've been trying to get hardware breakpoints with perf to work on POWER7 but I'm getting the following: % perf record -e mem:0x10000000 true Error: sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 28 (No space left on device). /bin/dmesg may provide additional information. Fatal: No CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS=y kernel support configured? true: Terminated (FWIW adding -a and it works fine) Debugging it seems that __reserve_bp_slot() is returning ENOSPC because it thinks there are no free breakpoint slots on this CPU. I have a 2 CPUs, so perf userspace is doing two perf_event_open syscalls to add a counter to each CPU [1]. The first syscall succeeds but the second is failing. On this second syscall, fetch_bp_busy_slots() sets slots.pinned to be 1, despite there being no breakpoint on this CPU. This is because the call the task_bp_pinned, checks all CPUs, rather than just the current CPU. POWER7 only has one hardware breakpoint per CPU (ie. HBP_NUM=1), so we return ENOSPC. The following patch fixes this by checking the associated CPU for each breakpoint in task_bp_pinned. I'm not familiar with this code, so it's provided as a reference to the above issue. Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com> Cc: K Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1351268936-2956-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* perf/hwpb: Invoke __perf_event_disable() if interrupts are already disabledK.Prasad2012-09-041-1/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | While debugging a warning message on PowerPC while using hardware breakpoints, it was discovered that when perf_event_disable is invoked through hw_breakpoint_handler function with interrupts disabled, a subsequent IPI in the code path would trigger a WARN_ON_ONCE message in smp_call_function_single function. This patch calls __perf_event_disable() when interrupts are already disabled, instead of perf_event_disable(). Reported-by: Edjunior Barbosa Machado <emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: K.Prasad <Prasad.Krishnan@gmail.com> [naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com: v3: Check to make sure we target current task] Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120802081635.5811.17737.stgit@localhost.localdomain [ Fixed build error on MIPS. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* perf: Disable PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_* when not supportedStephane Eranian2012-03-051-0/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_* is disabled for: - SW events (sw counters, tracepoints) - HW breakpoints - ALL but Intel x86 architecture - AMD64 processors Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1328826068-11713-10-git-send-email-eranian@google.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* Merge branch 'perf/urgent' into perf/coreIngo Molnar2012-03-051-2/+2
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Conflicts: tools/perf/builtin-record.c tools/perf/builtin-top.c tools/perf/perf.h tools/perf/util/top.h Merge reason: resolve these cherry-picking conflicts. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
| * perf/hwbp: Fix a possible memory leakNamhyung Kim2012-02-281-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If kzalloc() for TYPE_DATA failed on a given cpu, previous chunk of TYPE_INST will be leaked. Fix it. Thanks to Peter Zijlstra for suggesting this better solution. It should work as long as the initial value of the region is all 0's and that's the case of static (per-cpu) memory allocation. Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1330391978-28070-1-git-send-email-namhyung.kim@lge.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* | perf, arch: Rework perf_event_index()Peter Zijlstra2011-12-211-0/+7
|/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Put the logic to compute the event index into a per pmu method. This is required because the x86 rules are weird and wonderful and don't match the capabilities of the current scheme. AFAIK only powerpc actually has a usable userspace read of the PMCs but I'm not at all sure anybody actually used that. ARM is restored to the default since it currently does not support userspace access at all. And all software events are provided with a method that reports their index as 0 (disabled). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Michael Cree <mcree@orcon.net.nz> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Arun Sharma <asharma@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-dfydxodki16lylkt3gl2j7cw@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* perf: Add context field to perf_eventAvi Kivity2011-07-011-3/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The perf_event overflow handler does not receive any caller-derived argument, so many callers need to resort to looking up the perf_event in their local data structure. This is ugly and doesn't scale if a single callback services many perf_events. Fix by adding a context parameter to perf_event_create_kernel_counter() (and derived hardware breakpoints APIs) and storing it in the perf_event. The field can be accessed from the callback as event->overflow_handler_context. All callers are updated. Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1309362157-6596-2-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* hw breakpoints: Move to kernel/events/Borislav Petkov2011-05-031-0/+659
As part of the events sybsystem unification, relocate hw_breakpoint.c into its new destination. Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2024-05-26 06:21:58 +0000