From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx') diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c index 0f08f611c1a69..846e033c56fa7 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c @@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ static u64 notrace ixp4xx_read_sched_clock(void) * clocksource */ -static cycle_t ixp4xx_clocksource_read(struct clocksource *c) +static u64 ixp4xx_clocksource_read(struct clocksource *c) { return *IXP4XX_OSTS; } -- cgit v1.2.3