From 10596608c4d62cb8c1c2b806debcbd32fe657e71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Liping Zhang Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 22:54:18 +0800 Subject: netfilter: nf_tables: fix mismatch in big-endian system Currently, there are two different methods to store an u16 integer to the u32 data register. For example: u32 *dest = ®s->data[priv->dreg]; 1. *dest = 0; *(u16 *) dest = val_u16; 2. *dest = val_u16; For method 1, the u16 value will be stored like this, either in big-endian or little-endian system: 0 15 31 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Value | 0 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ For method 2, in little-endian system, the u16 value will be the same as listed above. But in big-endian system, the u16 value will be stored like this: 0 15 31 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 0 | Value | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ So later we use "memcmp(®s->data[priv->sreg], data, 2);" to do compare in nft_cmp, nft_lookup expr ..., method 2 will get the wrong result in big-endian system, as 0~15 bits will always be zero. For the similar reason, when loading an u16 value from the u32 data register, we should use "*(u16 *) sreg;" instead of "(u16)*sreg;", the 2nd method will get the wrong value in the big-endian system. So introduce some wrapper functions to store/load an u8 or u16 integer to/from the u32 data register, and use them in the right place. Signed-off-by: Liping Zhang Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso --- net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_masq_ipv6.c | 8 ++++---- net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_redir_ipv6.c | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/ipv6') diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_masq_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_masq_ipv6.c index 6c5b5b1830a74..4146536e9c151 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_masq_ipv6.c +++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_masq_ipv6.c @@ -27,10 +27,10 @@ static void nft_masq_ipv6_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr, memset(&range, 0, sizeof(range)); range.flags = priv->flags; if (priv->sreg_proto_min) { - range.min_proto.all = - *(__be16 *)®s->data[priv->sreg_proto_min]; - range.max_proto.all = - *(__be16 *)®s->data[priv->sreg_proto_max]; + range.min_proto.all = (__force __be16)nft_reg_load16( + ®s->data[priv->sreg_proto_min]); + range.max_proto.all = (__force __be16)nft_reg_load16( + ®s->data[priv->sreg_proto_max]); } regs->verdict.code = nf_nat_masquerade_ipv6(pkt->skb, &range, nft_out(pkt)); diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_redir_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_redir_ipv6.c index f5ac080fc0849..a27e424f690d6 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_redir_ipv6.c +++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_redir_ipv6.c @@ -26,10 +26,10 @@ static void nft_redir_ipv6_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr, memset(&range, 0, sizeof(range)); if (priv->sreg_proto_min) { - range.min_proto.all = - *(__be16 *)®s->data[priv->sreg_proto_min], - range.max_proto.all = - *(__be16 *)®s->data[priv->sreg_proto_max], + range.min_proto.all = (__force __be16)nft_reg_load16( + ®s->data[priv->sreg_proto_min]); + range.max_proto.all = (__force __be16)nft_reg_load16( + ®s->data[priv->sreg_proto_max]); range.flags |= NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_SPECIFIED; } -- cgit v1.2.3