From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- arch/avr32/kernel/time.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/avr32') diff --git a/arch/avr32/kernel/time.c b/arch/avr32/kernel/time.c index a124c55733db..4d9b69615979 100644 --- a/arch/avr32/kernel/time.c +++ b/arch/avr32/kernel/time.c @@ -20,9 +20,9 @@ static bool disable_cpu_idle_poll; -static cycle_t read_cycle_count(struct clocksource *cs) +static u64 read_cycle_count(struct clocksource *cs) { - return (cycle_t)sysreg_read(COUNT); + return (u64)sysreg_read(COUNT); } /* -- cgit v1.2.3