From f7142ed483f49f9108bea1be0c1afcd5d9098e05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lai Jiangshan Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 20:32:30 +0800 Subject: workqueue: simplify wq_update_unbound_numa() wq_update_unbound_numa() is known be called with wq_pool_mutex held. But wq_update_unbound_numa() requests wq->mutex before reading wq->unbound_attrs, wq->numa_pwq_tbl[] and wq->dfl_pwq. But these fields were changed to be allowed being read with wq_pool_mutex held. So we simply remove the mutex_lock(&wq->mutex). Without the dependence on the the mutex_lock(&wq->mutex), the test of wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa can also be moved upward. The old code need a long comment to describe the stableness of @wq->unbound_attrs which is also guaranteed by wq_pool_mutex now, so we don't need this such comment. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo --- kernel/workqueue.c | 20 +++++--------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/workqueue.c') diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index b1c222270e0e..4a9f65b54ee5 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -3708,7 +3708,8 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu, lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex); - if (!wq_numa_enabled || !(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)) + if (!wq_numa_enabled || !(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) || + wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa) return; /* @@ -3719,10 +3720,6 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu, target_attrs = wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf; cpumask = target_attrs->cpumask; - mutex_lock(&wq->mutex); - if (wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa) - goto out_unlock; - copy_workqueue_attrs(target_attrs, wq->unbound_attrs); pwq = unbound_pwq_by_node(wq, node); @@ -3734,33 +3731,26 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu, */ if (wq_calc_node_cpumask(wq->dfl_pwq->pool->attrs, node, cpu_off, cpumask)) { if (cpumask_equal(cpumask, pwq->pool->attrs->cpumask)) - goto out_unlock; + return; } else { goto use_dfl_pwq; } - mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex); - /* create a new pwq */ pwq = alloc_unbound_pwq(wq, target_attrs); if (!pwq) { pr_warn("workqueue: allocation failed while updating NUMA affinity of \"%s\"\n", wq->name); - mutex_lock(&wq->mutex); goto use_dfl_pwq; } - /* - * Install the new pwq. As this function is called only from CPU - * hotplug callbacks and applying a new attrs is wrapped with - * get/put_online_cpus(), @wq->unbound_attrs couldn't have changed - * inbetween. - */ + /* Install the new pwq. */ mutex_lock(&wq->mutex); old_pwq = numa_pwq_tbl_install(wq, node, pwq); goto out_unlock; use_dfl_pwq: + mutex_lock(&wq->mutex); spin_lock_irq(&wq->dfl_pwq->pool->lock); get_pwq(wq->dfl_pwq); spin_unlock_irq(&wq->dfl_pwq->pool->lock); -- cgit v1.2.3