1 files changed, 0 insertions, 46 deletions
diff --git a/patches/netperf-2.7.0/0001-fix-inlining.patch b/patches/netperf-2.7.0/0001-fix-inlining.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 1e6689da7..000000000
--- a/patches/netperf-2.7.0/0001-fix-inlining.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,46 +0,0 @@
-From 68cfbafb9f239950065e6a0ed7ca60c12668740f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>
-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 16:14:01 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH] fix inlining
-
-Signed-off-by: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>
----
- src/netlib.c | 14 +-------------
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/src/netlib.c b/src/netlib.c
-index f3a3fe5e00ab..4465d0f1b5f3 100644
---- a/src/netlib.c
-+++ b/src/netlib.c
-@@ -3997,11 +3997,7 @@ void demo_stream_setup(uint32_t a, uint32_t b) {
-   }
- }
- 
--#ifdef WIN32
--__forceinline void demo_interval_display(double actual_interval)
--#else
--  inline void demo_interval_display(double actual_interval)
--#endif
-+void demo_interval_display(double actual_interval)
- {
-   static int count = 0;
-   struct timeval now;
-@@ -4060,15 +4056,7 @@ __forceinline void demo_interval_display(double actual_interval)
-    important compilers have supported such a construct so it should
-    not be a big deal. raj 2012-01-23 */
- 
--#ifdef WIN32
--/* It would seem that the Microsoft compiler will not inline across
--   source files. So there is little point in having an inline
--   directive in that situation.  Of course that makes me wonder if an
--   inline directive has to appear in netlib.h... */
- void demo_interval_tick(uint32_t units)
--#else
--  inline void demo_interval_tick(uint32_t units)
--#endif
- {
-   double actual_interval = 0.0;
- 
--- 
-2.10.2
-