diff options
| author | Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> | 2018-03-24 12:58:29 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> | 2018-04-04 16:45:32 +0300 |
| commit | 38057aa1639b74d5c1e0dc1ca7c22bc7a31de714 (patch) | |
| tree | 577ab02a7b4c035d739c1e2bc6ee9b559370f705 /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | |
| parent | fbcc85974a49e9a6f3deb67fe3a0d4fb1af49983 (diff) | |
| download | linux-0-day-38057aa1639b74d5c1e0dc1ca7c22bc7a31de714.tar.gz linux-0-day-38057aa1639b74d5c1e0dc1ca7c22bc7a31de714.tar.xz | |
drm/i915/execlists: Clear user-active flag on preemption completion
When cancelling the requests and clearing out the ports following a
successful preemption completion, also clear the active flag. I had
assumed that all preemptions would be followed by an immediate dequeue
(preserving the active user flag), but under rare circumstances we may
be triggering a preemption for the second port only for it to have
completed before the preemotion kicks in; leaving execlists->active set
even though the system is now idle.
We can clear the flag inside the common execlists_cancel_port_requests()
as the other users also expect the semantics of active being cleared.
Fixes: f6322eddaff7 ("drm/i915/preemption: Allow preemption between submission ports")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180324125829.27026-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit eed7ec52f214bac2f25395ccaad610fbeb842a6e)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c index 697af5add78ba..e3a5f673ff673 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c @@ -577,6 +577,8 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) * know the next preemption status we see corresponds * to this ELSP update. */ + GEM_BUG_ON(!execlists_is_active(execlists, + EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER)); GEM_BUG_ON(!port_count(&port[0])); if (port_count(&port[0]) > 1) goto unlock; @@ -738,6 +740,8 @@ execlists_cancel_port_requests(struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists) memset(port, 0, sizeof(*port)); port++; } + + execlists_clear_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER); } static void execlists_cancel_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) @@ -1001,6 +1005,11 @@ static void execlists_submission_tasklet(unsigned long data) if (fw) intel_uncore_forcewake_put(dev_priv, execlists->fw_domains); + + /* If the engine is now idle, so should be the flag; and vice versa. */ + GEM_BUG_ON(execlists_is_active(&engine->execlists, + EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER) == + !port_isset(engine->execlists.port)); } static void queue_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, |