summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/smc/smc_clc.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorUrsula Braun <ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2017-12-07 13:38:49 +0100
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2017-12-07 15:03:12 -0500
commite7b7a64a8493d47433fd003efbe6543e3f676294 (patch)
treeaf5a7ade751925773bf6394584969014662dc8ac /net/smc/smc_clc.c
parent6b5771aa3c351b118b1eee7bc98e1483eb0c8ca8 (diff)
downloadlinux-0-day-e7b7a64a8493d47433fd003efbe6543e3f676294.tar.gz
linux-0-day-e7b7a64a8493d47433fd003efbe6543e3f676294.tar.xz
smc: support variable CLC proposal messages
According to RFC7609 [1] the CLC proposal message contains an area of unknown length for future growth. Additionally it may contain up to 8 IPv6 prefixes. The current version of the SMC-code does not understand CLC proposal messages using these variable length fields and, thus, is incompatible with SMC implementations in other operating systems. This patch makes sure, SMC understands incoming CLC proposals * with arbitrary length values for future growth * with up to 8 IPv6 prefixes [1] SMC-R Informational RFC: http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7609 Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Hans Wippel <hwippel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/smc/smc_clc.c')
-rw-r--r--net/smc/smc_clc.c82
1 files changed, 69 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_clc.c b/net/smc/smc_clc.c
index f5e17d29112b2..abf7ceb6690b1 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_clc.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_clc.c
@@ -22,6 +22,54 @@
#include "smc_clc.h"
#include "smc_ib.h"
+/* check if received message has a correct header length and contains valid
+ * heading and trailing eyecatchers
+ */
+static bool smc_clc_msg_hdr_valid(struct smc_clc_msg_hdr *clcm)
+{
+ struct smc_clc_msg_proposal_prefix *pclc_prfx;
+ struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm *clc;
+ struct smc_clc_msg_proposal *pclc;
+ struct smc_clc_msg_decline *dclc;
+ struct smc_clc_msg_trail *trl;
+
+ if (memcmp(clcm->eyecatcher, SMC_EYECATCHER, sizeof(SMC_EYECATCHER)))
+ return false;
+ switch (clcm->type) {
+ case SMC_CLC_PROPOSAL:
+ pclc = (struct smc_clc_msg_proposal *)clcm;
+ pclc_prfx = smc_clc_proposal_get_prefix(pclc);
+ if (ntohs(pclc->hdr.length) !=
+ sizeof(*pclc) + ntohs(pclc->iparea_offset) +
+ sizeof(*pclc_prfx) +
+ pclc_prfx->ipv6_prefixes_cnt *
+ sizeof(struct smc_clc_ipv6_prefix) +
+ sizeof(*trl))
+ return false;
+ trl = (struct smc_clc_msg_trail *)
+ ((u8 *)pclc + ntohs(pclc->hdr.length) - sizeof(*trl));
+ break;
+ case SMC_CLC_ACCEPT:
+ case SMC_CLC_CONFIRM:
+ clc = (struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm *)clcm;
+ if (ntohs(clc->hdr.length) != sizeof(*clc))
+ return false;
+ trl = &clc->trl;
+ break;
+ case SMC_CLC_DECLINE:
+ dclc = (struct smc_clc_msg_decline *)clcm;
+ if (ntohs(dclc->hdr.length) != sizeof(*dclc))
+ return false;
+ trl = &dclc->trl;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+ if (memcmp(trl->eyecatcher, SMC_EYECATCHER, sizeof(SMC_EYECATCHER)))
+ return false;
+ return true;
+}
+
/* Wait for data on the tcp-socket, analyze received data
* Returns:
* 0 if success and it was not a decline that we received.
@@ -72,9 +120,7 @@ int smc_clc_wait_msg(struct smc_sock *smc, void *buf, int buflen,
}
datlen = ntohs(clcm->length);
if ((len < sizeof(struct smc_clc_msg_hdr)) ||
- (datlen < sizeof(struct smc_clc_msg_decline)) ||
- (datlen > sizeof(struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm)) ||
- memcmp(clcm->eyecatcher, SMC_EYECATCHER, sizeof(SMC_EYECATCHER)) ||
+ (datlen > buflen) ||
((clcm->type != SMC_CLC_DECLINE) &&
(clcm->type != expected_type))) {
smc->sk.sk_err = EPROTO;
@@ -89,7 +135,7 @@ int smc_clc_wait_msg(struct smc_sock *smc, void *buf, int buflen,
krflags = MSG_WAITALL;
smc->clcsock->sk->sk_rcvtimeo = CLC_WAIT_TIME;
len = kernel_recvmsg(smc->clcsock, &msg, &vec, 1, datlen, krflags);
- if (len < datlen) {
+ if (len < datlen || !smc_clc_msg_hdr_valid(clcm)) {
smc->sk.sk_err = EPROTO;
reason_code = -EPROTO;
goto out;
@@ -141,33 +187,43 @@ int smc_clc_send_proposal(struct smc_sock *smc,
struct smc_ib_device *smcibdev,
u8 ibport)
{
+ struct smc_clc_msg_proposal_prefix pclc_prfx;
struct smc_clc_msg_proposal pclc;
+ struct smc_clc_msg_trail trl;
int reason_code = 0;
+ struct kvec vec[3];
struct msghdr msg;
- struct kvec vec;
- int len, rc;
+ int len, plen, rc;
/* send SMC Proposal CLC message */
+ plen = sizeof(pclc) + sizeof(pclc_prfx) + sizeof(trl);
memset(&pclc, 0, sizeof(pclc));
memcpy(pclc.hdr.eyecatcher, SMC_EYECATCHER, sizeof(SMC_EYECATCHER));
pclc.hdr.type = SMC_CLC_PROPOSAL;
- pclc.hdr.length = htons(sizeof(pclc));
+ pclc.hdr.length = htons(plen);
pclc.hdr.version = SMC_CLC_V1; /* SMC version */
memcpy(pclc.lcl.id_for_peer, local_systemid, sizeof(local_systemid));
memcpy(&pclc.lcl.gid, &smcibdev->gid[ibport - 1], SMC_GID_SIZE);
memcpy(&pclc.lcl.mac, &smcibdev->mac[ibport - 1], ETH_ALEN);
+ pclc.iparea_offset = htons(0);
+ memset(&pclc_prfx, 0, sizeof(pclc_prfx));
/* determine subnet and mask from internal TCP socket */
- rc = smc_netinfo_by_tcpsk(smc->clcsock, &pclc.outgoing_subnet,
- &pclc.prefix_len);
+ rc = smc_netinfo_by_tcpsk(smc->clcsock, &pclc_prfx.outgoing_subnet,
+ &pclc_prfx.prefix_len);
if (rc)
return SMC_CLC_DECL_CNFERR; /* configuration error */
- memcpy(pclc.trl.eyecatcher, SMC_EYECATCHER, sizeof(SMC_EYECATCHER));
+ pclc_prfx.ipv6_prefixes_cnt = 0;
+ memcpy(trl.eyecatcher, SMC_EYECATCHER, sizeof(SMC_EYECATCHER));
memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
- vec.iov_base = &pclc;
- vec.iov_len = sizeof(pclc);
+ vec[0].iov_base = &pclc;
+ vec[0].iov_len = sizeof(pclc);
+ vec[1].iov_base = &pclc_prfx;
+ vec[1].iov_len = sizeof(pclc_prfx);
+ vec[2].iov_base = &trl;
+ vec[2].iov_len = sizeof(trl);
/* due to the few bytes needed for clc-handshake this cannot block */
- len = kernel_sendmsg(smc->clcsock, &msg, &vec, 1, sizeof(pclc));
+ len = kernel_sendmsg(smc->clcsock, &msg, vec, 3, plen);
if (len < sizeof(pclc)) {
if (len >= 0) {
reason_code = -ENETUNREACH;