summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2015-03-27 11:22:17 +1100
committerBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>2015-03-31 13:10:39 +1100
commit433185d2b4e9c25f2a444424c05af72fbadd4275 (patch)
tree8890e9a7b5560458bdb9d2694b8f0f39633ed5e7 /arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
parentc6406d8fbb014bebdfb5bf3c244548958aec7379 (diff)
downloadlinux-433185d2b4e9c25f2a444424c05af72fbadd4275.tar.gz
linux-433185d2b4e9c25f2a444424c05af72fbadd4275.tar.xz
powerpc/eeh: Fix PE#0 check in eeh_add_to_parent_pe()
The function eeh_add_parent_pe() is used to create a PE or add one edev to its parent PE. Current code checks if PE#0 is valid for the later case. Actually, we should validate PE#0 for both cases when EEH core regards PE#0 as invalid one (without flag EEH_VALID_PE_ZERO). Otherwise, not all EEH devices can be added to its parent PE#0 for EEH on P7IOC. The patch fixes the issue by validating PE#0 for the two cases. So far, we don't have PE#0 for EEH on P7IOC, but it will show up when we enable M64 for P7IOC. The patch also makes the error message more meaningful. Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c13
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
index f33ceccf6876..35f0b62259bb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
@@ -328,6 +328,13 @@ int eeh_add_to_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev)
{
struct eeh_pe *pe, *parent;
+ /* Check if the PE number is valid */
+ if (!eeh_has_flag(EEH_VALID_PE_ZERO) && !edev->pe_config_addr) {
+ pr_err("%s: Invalid PE#0 for edev 0x%x on PHB#%d\n",
+ __func__, edev->config_addr, edev->phb->global_number);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
/*
* Search the PE has been existing or not according
* to the PE address. If that has been existing, the
@@ -336,12 +343,6 @@ int eeh_add_to_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev)
*/
pe = eeh_pe_get(edev);
if (pe && !(pe->type & EEH_PE_INVALID)) {
- if (!edev->pe_config_addr) {
- pr_err("%s: PE with addr 0x%x already exists\n",
- __func__, edev->config_addr);
- return -EEXIST;
- }
-
/* Mark the PE as type of PCI bus */
pe->type = EEH_PE_BUS;
edev->pe = pe;